Yardstick

Currently, there has been lot of discussions on the few God-men in India, someone is running sex racket, someone has no morality and someone has no regrets for the death of over 60 people in his retreat.

It is obvious, that such incidents are detrimental to the reputation of the truly sacred Spiritual teachers, Sages and everyone who has chosen the higher path. They practice more than preaching. In Indian culture they are revered and followed upon for the knowledge, guidance and self-realization.

One of the popular television channel, with the intention of bringing an awareness amongst the masses, organized a live debate of holy men from various sects and traditions. They were all unanimous in condemning such phony God-men. But they confined their opinion within their own boundaries of practice and preaching. The TV anchor suggested that why can't there be a process to identify true God-man from the false ones so that common man are not mislead?

On the face value it appeared to be a good idea but soon Mind wandered..."Who will throw the first stone?"

The entire history of mankind has been full of evidences of every organized religion trying to prove another one inferior and establish its own supremacy at any costs. In the process, mankind lost the sense of direction and often went to a point of no- return or dead-end under-utilizing valuable human Life.

Mind wonders... how can there be a consensus amongst the Holy men when they may feel more qualified to judge others than being judged.

Besides, is it right for a common man to accept such opinion or endorsement and follow them against his own judgment or free will?

Then what is the yardstick one should use who is still entangled in the Grandma's knot?

Few moments of meditation and Mind opens up...

In every organized religion or otherwise, there have always been individuals respected not only by their own followers but also by their rivals (although not in true sense) for their Character, Spiritual progress and their Teachings.

Their Character, projected observance of Universal prerequisites with whatever name one may call it like Precepts, Ethics/Morality, Sila, etc. as a thread within the necklace of colourful beads which ties them all, remains invisible but strong.

Spiritual progress.. they are constantly striving on their path, not hurting, harming man or mankind in any manner.

Their Teachings has always been Universal, free of any kind of binding and based on self-experience/realization.

But aren't they mutually dependent? How can one select any one of them?

To know the boundary, one has to cross it. Therefore, judging their spiritual progress may be difficult for a common man with his mundane yardstick.

Teachings, if it binds in any manner? how can it possibly lead to freedom or liberation?

Character, is the most obvious, verifiable and tangible than the other two.

Therefore, is Sila not a minimum Yardstick for a common man to use for himself and others?

.
.
.

Virtuous and wise Life of a single day outweighs a hundred years of sinful unbridled Life - Dhammapada